weRead has a new logo

Recently our creative team was charged with creating the new logo for weRead. Obviously there were initial questions to be answered.
“How do we say ‘Social Network for Book Lovers’ in the form of a tiny dingbat?” With monkeys? With monkeys reading books? While wearing hats? Unfortunately that one didn’t go over too well.
Someone suggested a book. (Light bulbs going off in head). Actually a lot of people around the office suggested a lot of things. We listened to some, threw Nerf darts at the rest. After a few weeks of collaborative design (a few bottles of beer, some bourbon and a take out pizza or four, we came up with a final design).
By the way, thanks to our international team of commentators who couldn’t see the book no matter how hard they tried. (There is no book, there is only you. Or whatever that spiritual prodigy tells Neo in the Matrix.)
The weRead logo consists of 2 elements. The main element, which is the book, and the secondary element which is the speech bubble. The book is self-explanatory. If you need more explanation, email us and maybe we’ll come up with something after we finish off the rest of the bourbon.
The speech bubble represents the social aspect of weRead. It is the simplest, most common sense way we could come up with of expressing the fact that weRead connects people who want to talk about books. These days the speech bubble itself has become a symbol almost as commonplace as any letter of the alphabet. It’s consistent and easily recognizable as a symbol for communication. So put the book and the speech bubble together and these elements communicate the goal of weRead: to be a discovery platform for books.
Potential sticking points:
1. Is the speech bubble overused? Maybe. We say it has been abused, and we are officially reclaiming it.
2. Should Comedy Central and CNN really be using a speech bubble? We think not. However we do feel it is appropriate for weRead. It represents the company itself and isn’t used gratuitously (except when we need a plus one or some swag).
Conversely we have no problem in the gratuitous use of red and blue, because they
make you want to read tons and tons of books (ok, maybe not really, but it sounds good). The colors are vivid, the boldness of each provide a feeling of fun and energy, not to mention we also liked the fact that these colors looked good with the carpet in the office.
The overall cleanliness and simplicity of the logo succinctly sums up weRead. We picked the font Neutra, a mid-century font true to the international style that stands for innovation and progress. It has a unique enlarged x-height of the lowercase letters (that means that the top part of a letter like “b” is really tall) and increased contrast in its strokes for enhanced readability. Most of all it’s easy on the eyes for us old folks and those of us with ADD, which is pretty important.
- the creative kids at Lulu and weRead (Rob, Nuno, Caroline & Manny)


Hi there,
I am using the great program (We read),
What kind of help do you need to support arabic book with the same program ?
please do it, a lot of Arabic people will share there reviews about their readings.
So please tell me what kind of help do you need to do it, I will do my best to help so we can use the same program for Arabic books also !
Thanks & best regards,
Ahmed Al-Harban
alharban@gmail.com
Ahmed Al-Harban
21 Jan 09 at 12:11 pm
Often the logos stand for what their creator claim them to stand for. lol!
But this one has been an exception. It was easy to ‘read’ - sort of! The font choice is nice - I like to see the distinct strokes in the lower case which are not only easy on the eye but also pleasing.
tnx for sharing an explanation of the logo.
SRININ
24 Jan 09 at 10:48 pm
I’d rather have something more cerebral than a speech bubble but I can live with it. but the colors really bother me. Red and blue are too patriotic for me… to Americana … and I think of reading as more worldly … Yeah, it really bothers me. I’d rather see some muted colors, nondescript… colors that have no obvious name… no “pink” or “orange” but something that we wouldn’t put a name to right away, only that it is in, say, the “brown family” or the “pink family”, for instance. Plz get rid of the blue & red ..
Sierra
8 Mar 09 at 7:12 pm